Gene editing of the human embryo: tensions and controversies among scientists
Abstract
Objective
This study analyzed the relation between the position of scientists on embryo editing and the
different types of knowledge involved.
Method
A lexical analysis of 151 scientific articles in the PubMed and Web of Science databases was
conducted using the IRAMUTEQ software.
Results
The results showed that gene editing in embryos is presented in two argumentative
branches: the first refers to the editing technique and its possibilities; the second discusses
the impacts of these techniques on the public arena. The results demonstrate a consensus
regarding the potential of editing; however, dilemmas about its effectiveness were also
highlighted.
Conclusion
The presence of ethical conflicts with embryo editing among the specialists was evidenced
especially regarding the birth of genetically modified babies. Therefore, gene editing is marked
by conflicts that are not limited only to biological contexts, but that encompasses different
aspects of social life.
Origin | Publisher files allowed on an open archive |
---|---|
Licence |