L'OBJECTIVITÉ DU DROIT DANS LES CAS DE DÉSACCORD PERSISTANT SUR LE DROIT ENTRE JUGES
Abstract
Intuitively, the disagreement is related to subjectivity. The aim of this paper is to show that the possibility of determining objective reasons explains the objectivity of the law despite of the disagreement. However, there are factors of resistance to the objectification of the reasons which explain the persistence of the disagreement.
Origin : Publisher files allowed on an open archive