Conditional Beliefs: from Neighbourhood Semantics to Sequent Calculus - Aix-Marseille Université Access content directly
Journal Articles The review of symbolic logic Year : 2018

Conditional Beliefs: from Neighbourhood Semantics to Sequent Calculus

Croyances conditionnelles : de la Sémantique neighbourhood au calcul des sequents

Abstract

The logic of Conditional Beliefs (CDL) has been introduced by Board, Baltag and Smets to reason about knowledge and revisable beliefs in a multi-agent setting. In this paper both the semantics and the proof theory for this logic are studied. First, a natural semantics for CDL is defined in terms of neighbourhood models, a multi-agent generalisation of Lewis' spheres models, and it is shown that the axiomatization of CDL is sound and complete with respect to this semantics. Second, it is shown that the neighbourhood semantics is equivalent to the original one defined in terms of plausibility models, by means of a direct correspondence between the two types of models. On the basis of neighbourhood semantics, a labelled sequent calculus for CDL is obtained. The calculus has strong proof-theoretic properties, in particular admissibility of contraction and cut, and it provides a decision procedure for the logic. Furthermore, its semantic completeness is used to obtain a constructive proof of the finite model property of the logic. Finally, it is shown that other doxastic operators can be easily captured within neighbourhood semantics. This fact provides further evidence of the naturalness of the neighbourhood semantics for the analysis of epistemic/doxastic notions.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
logic_conditional_belief.pdf (558.09 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Files produced by the author(s)
Loading...

Dates and versions

hal-01702961 , version 1 (07-02-2018)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : hal-01702961 , version 1

Cite

Marianna Girlando, Sara Negri, Nicola Olivetti, Vincent Risch. Conditional Beliefs: from Neighbourhood Semantics to Sequent Calculus. The review of symbolic logic, 2018, pp.1-44. ⟨hal-01702961⟩
185 View
150 Download

Share

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More